Skip to main content

Day 51, Multi-Campus Churches; Good or Bad?


In yesterday's USA Today, the lead story on the front paper was "New Face of evangelism 1 Church, multiple sites". The writer goes one to cite several different new church leaders, and their current understand and 'take' on the 'new face' idea of having a central head church, and multiple other campuses. The main pastor would basically, only go to each church to preach, and thus be traveling the rest of Sunday to get to each location. This varies greatly from the traditional pastor who does all the counseling, preaching, fostering discipleship at one location.

Some churches have even set up a type of video-cast that the pastor would only need to preach in one central location, while the other congregations would only need to plug into the video feed and watch their pastor via a streaming download.

Now, as I thought about this, I wondered what the natural response would be for me. Is this really new? Would I like being the pastor traveling around all day? Would I want to sit and listen to a screen preaching to me? Does this draw the church together or separate it? I don't know.

I do know that this 'traveling preaching' is nothing new. George Whitfield did it all through America, thus creating the fertile ground for the Awakenings, of 1740's.

So here's my short take/or observations:
1. There are a handful of preachers that I would definitely would say could do something like this, Yet does this make an emphasis on the preacher or the message. John Piper, for instance, and incredible orator/preacher...but the expansion of his preaching ministry like this, could inhibit those who are in those various areas to take up the calling in their own life, and become preachers.

2. Does this create a 'superstar' mentality that I believe that all ministers already struggle with so greatly.

3. Yet again, some churches would be served by having quality preaching each week, even if it meant it came via internet/videofeed or whatever.

These are just three observations. I am just bringing it to the surface, because I read it, and was intrigued enough at the Shoppette to buy a paper.

Bottomline: How would you feel if your pastor was a traveling preacher? Would you feel this centralizes your church or do you feel this would be the vehicle that your church would reach more people, plant more churches, in your area? Always be about reforming your views, to what the Scripture teaches us. I am not convinced either way on this issue,... whether this is particularly good or bad,...

as long as Christ is preached, who gives a rip.

Comments

  1. John
    I have mixed emotions on this. Didn't Jesus tell his disciples. "Go forth and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit". I would think that would and did take some traveling to make that happen. We are in the information age and if that means using the internet or what have you to spread the Word then so be it. I frequent a Church website that does exactly that. It is the church my Sister in law attend there in Colorado called Easter Hills Community Church. I like the way the pastor there teaches as well. Here is the link if you like. He does a weekly sermon online. http://www.ehills.org/
    As for Tim, I like my small church that I attend. I like to look people in the face when I talk with them. I like being connected but I like relationships as well. There is nothing shaking someone's hand and looking them in the eye and telling them that God loves you.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Day 3, 10 years of John Piper

Its true, I am a Piperite. Here's my story: 10 years ago, I sat down in my lovely rented 'Triple-J' Ranch home with Josh Stewart, and popped in a sermon tape by John Piper. I remember as if it were yesterday. The title was appealing, "Did Christ die for you or for God?". Seemed provocative enough to engage my senses. 10 minutes after it had started, I could barely hold back my thoughts of how this man preached with such authority and seriousness. It wasn't hell fire and brimstone, and it wasn't comic relief. It seemed as though this was his last sermon, and this was the last sermon the audience would ever hear. Every now and then, I would steal a glance at Josh as we listened, and I could tell he was going through the same internal breakdown I was experiencing. Soon after the sermon was over, I made it my goal to read a book by this guy. The Borders I went and got a copy of "Pleasures of God". I began to read, and waves of questions flooded my m...

Day 70, Avatar, Did I 'see' it? (I did but it was called...)

"So, what did you think?" is the reverberating mantra as we all stand out our cushy popcorn laiden seats and grab our mysterious trash. I didn't want to answer because I had such mixed feelings. So, after 48 hours of work, a 3.3 mile run, and a several cups of coffee, ...I think I can write something that is not completely nonsensical. Here's my try. It took awhile for me to get passed the Ferngully, Dances with Wolves, Never-Ending Story, Star Wars, Zelda and Smurf overtures. Ferngully/Zelda because it seemed I was watching a documentary on the rain forest and how the 'great tree' held everything together in green peace. Dances with Wolves, as the new 'Kevin' be-friends a tribe and eventually goes 'en-gine' (Indian) on the United States Calvary taming the ta-tonka (Buffalo). Never-Ending Story, because who in the world can hang on to any animal and fly. Star Wars because, if you remember in Star Wars I, the Naboo people with Jar-Jar...I trul...

Day 67, Conversations that Change Us: Predestination

Sunday night a good friend of mine who is a West Point Graduate, and Battery Commander (Pretty Sharp dude) said, "Hey, I have got a question for you...What do you think about predestination?" Now, in many circles this would be resolved with two likely responses. 1. "Well, I think we should just leave those doctrines that divide the churches alone and focus on what really matters." 2. "Well, I have never really nailed down what I believe and thus will continue talking to eventually change the subject." I chose neither. I could tell that he had really been thinking about this. This was not one of those 'stump the chump' questions. I smiled and decided I would let him fill out the question and talk his way through it. As he did so, I would smile and put a guard rail or would give him what various views were. His eyes widened as he just began to have a huge dialogue with himself. I could tell his conversation was shaking and solidifying some idea...